In classic storytelling, the hero (protagonist) and villain (antagonist) are diametrically opposed in goals. The role of the villain is to thwart the hero, but the hero wins out in the end.
The lines between the two characters are becoming increasingly blurred in contemporary cinema to reflect the increasing complexity of life. The hero isn’t absolutely good (flaw) and the villain isn’t absolutely bad. Despite the predominant characteristics in each, there is overlap. And this overlap is increasing to give heroes extensive negative traits (anti-hero) and the villain positive ones despite their relentless wreaking havoc. These permutations ultimately make more interesting characters.
Firstly, it’s important to establish the values and moral code of the villain. Where are they coming from? What is their motivation? Religious zealots are a prime example. They veritably cause untold destruction for the greater good.
There is often confusion whether the protagonist must always be a hero. In some respects yes, but protagonists can be criminals and villains.
Deep down we all want break social norms and secretly root for the villains. Nobody likes a goody two shoes. People who always follow the rules aren’t remembered nor do they change the world.
Villains vary greatly in degree according to genre. Consider a villain in a romantic comedy trying to prevent two people falling in love by any means possible, so that they can find their true loves. Conversely, consider the Joker in Batman and other action thrillers.
In answer to our question, a hero can be a villain, usually by how they impact a community. In a previous post, I claimed that villains are the dark side of the heroes. Both ultimately want the same thing and are antithetical components of the same character.
Posted on January 5, 2012
0